Use of a cognitive computing system for treatment of colon and gastric cancer in South Korea.

Author:

Baek Jeong-Heum1,Ahn Sung-Min2,Urman Alexandra3,Kim Young Saing4,Ahn Hee Kyung4,Won Park Sung2,Lee Won-Suk5,Sym Sun Jin4,Park Heun Kyu6,Chun Yong-Soon7,Cho Eun Kyung4,Lee Woon-Kee8,Shin Dongbok9,Kim Young-Bo2,Dankwa-Mullan Irene10,Norden Andrew D11,Rhee Kyu12,Lee Uhn2

Affiliation:

1. Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea;

2. Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea;

3. IBM Watson Health, Somers, NY;

4. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea;

5. Department of General Surgery, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea;

6. Department of Surgery, Breast Cancer Center, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea;

7. Department of Surgery, Breast Cancer Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Cente, Incheon, Republic of Korea;

8. Department of General Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea;

9. Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea South;

10. IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD;

11. IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA;

12. IBM Watson Health, Southbury, CT;

Abstract

e18204 Background: IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a Memorial Sloan Kettering-trained cognitive computing system that provides oncologists with evidence-based treatment options for cancer. Treatments are presented in three categories: “Recommended”, “For Consideration” and “Not Recommended”. We examined the concordance of treatment options between WFO and the tumor board from Gachon University Gil Medical Centre (GMC), Incheon, South Korea. GMC is an urban center that cares for 50,000 cancer patients annually. Methods: We enrolled 340 patients with stage II, III and IV colon cancer and 185 with chemotherapy-naïve advanced gastric cancer, all treated between 2012 and 2016. Cases were processed using WFO, and the output was compared to blinded tumor board recommendations. Treatment options were considered concordant when the GMC recommendation was included in the “Recommended” or “For Consideration” categories. Results: Treatment recommendations were concordant in 248 (73%) of the 340 evaluated colon cancer cases. Of 250 patients treated in the adjuvant setting, 212 (85%) were concordant. Of 90 patients with metastatic disease, 36 (40%) were concordant. Treatment recommendations were concordant in 90 (49%) of 185 chemotherapy-naïve gastric cancer patients. Low concordance rates in gastric cancer were explained by two observations: (1) The trastzumab/FOLFOX regimen is not covered by the Korean National Health Insurance System, and (2) A regimen known as S-1 (tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) plus cisplatin is routinely used in Korea and is not used in the U.S. Conclusions: Treatment options suggested by WFO were concordant with the therapeutic decisions of GMC in the large majority of colon cancer patients treated in the adjuvant setting. Lower degrees of concordance were seen in patients with metastatic colon and gastric cancer, reflecting differences in practice patterns between the United States, where WFO was trained, and GMC, in Korea. Geography-specific customization is available in WFO and should enable physicians and patients to benefit from WFO worldwide. WFO's ability to learn from gastric cancer cases in a part of the world with increased incidence may reveal insights that are applicable elsewhere.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3