BC2001 long-term outcomes: A phase III randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy (RT) alone and standard RT versus reduced high-dose volume RT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Author:

Hall Emma1,Hussain Syed A.2,Porta Nuria3,Crundwell Malcolm4,Jenkins Peter5,Rawlings Christine Lisa6,Tremlett Jean7,Friend Charlotte3,Stubbs Clive8,Lewis Rebecca1,James Nicholas D.9,Huddart Robert Anthony10,

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom;

2. University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom;

3. Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom;

4. Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom;

5. Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, United Kingdom;

6. South Devon Healthcare NHS Foundation, Torbay, United Kingdom;

7. Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom;

8. Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom;

9. University of Birmingham and Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Brimingham, United Kingdom;

10. Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom;

Abstract

280 Background: BC2001 showed that adding chemotherapy (5FU+MMC) to radiotherapy significantly improved rates of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) locoregional control (LRC) [James 2012] but that reduced high dose volume RT rather than standard RT did not significantly reduce late side effects [Huddart 2013]. Here we present an update of the time to event outcomes after a median 10 years follow up. Methods: Under the 2x2 partial factorial design, 458 pts were randomised to RT (178) or cRT (182) (CT comparison) and/or to stRT (108) or RHDVRT (111) (RT comparison). Primary endpoint was LRC, secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), bladder-cancer specific survival (BCSS), metastasis free survival (MFS) and salvage cystectomy rates. Results: Median follow up was 118 months (95%CI: 112-122). LRC and invasive LRC (ILRC) were improved with cRT (Table 1). Though no statistically significant differences between groups were found in OS, cRT exhibited a trend towards improvement in BCSS, significant when adjusted by known prognostic factors. Similar trend was found for MFS. Salvage cystectomy rate was lower for cRT (2-year rate, cRT:11% vs RT:17%, p=0.03). No differences between stRT and RHDVRT were found for any trial endpoint. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, an improvement in LRC and a reduced salvage cystectomy rate is confirmed with cRT. After adjustment for known prognostic factors this results in an improvement in BCSS. This updated data supports the use of cRT with 5FU/MMC and confirms this should be a standard of care for this patient population. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN68324339. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3