Paclitaxel With Inhibitor of Apoptosis Antagonist, LCL161, for Localized Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, Prospectively Stratified by Gene Signature in a Biomarker-Driven Neoadjuvant Trial
-
Published:2018-11-01
Issue:31
Volume:36
Page:3126-3133
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Bardia Aditya1, Parton Marina1, Kümmel Sherko1, Estévez Laura G.1, Huang Chiun-Sheng1, Cortés Javier1, Ruiz-Borrego Manuel1, Telli Melinda L.1, Martin-Martorell Paloma1, López Rafael1, Beck J. Thaddeus1, Ismail-Khan Roohi1, Chen Shin-Cheh1, Hurvitz Sara A.1, Mayer Ingrid A.1, Carreon Daniel1, Cameron Scott1, Liao Serena1, Baselga José1, Kim Sung-Bae1
Affiliation:
1. Aditya Bardia, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Scott Cameron and Serena Liao, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA; Marina Parton, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Sherko Kümmel, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Laura G. Estévez, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal; Javier Cortés, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid; Javier Cortés,Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego,...
Abstract
Purpose There are currently no targeted therapies approved for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A tumor necrosis factor α ( TNFα)–based gene expression signature (GS) predictive of sensitivity to LCL161, inhibitor of apoptosis antagonist, was translated into a clinical assay and evaluated in a neoadjuvant trial. Patients and Methods Women with localized TNBC (T2/N0–2/M0) were prospectively stratified by GS status and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral LCL161 (1,800 mg once per week) and intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 once per week; combination arm) or paclitaxel alone (control arm) for 12 weeks, followed by surgery. The primary objective was to determine whether neoadjuvant LCL161 enhances efficacy of paclitaxel, defined by > 7.5% increase in the pathologic complete response (pCR, breast) rate, stratified by GS. Results Of 209 patients enrolled (207 with valid GS scores), 30.4% had GS-positive TNBC. In the GS-positive group, pCR was higher in the combination versus the control arm (38.2% v 17.2%), with 88.8% posterior probability of > 7.5% increase in pCR. However, in the GS-negative group, the pCR was lower in the combination group (5.6% v 16.4%), with 0% posterior probability of > 7.5% increase in pCR. A higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the combination arm included neutropenia (24.5%) and diarrhea (5.7%). Overall, 19 patients (18.1%) in the combination arm discontinued treatment because of adverse events, including pyrexia (n = 5), pneumonia (n = 4), and pneumonitis (n = 4), versus five patients (4.9%) in the control arm. Conclusion This neoadjuvant trial provides evidence supporting a biomarker-driven targeted therapy approach for selected patients with GS-positive TNBC and demonstrates the utility of a neoadjuvant trial for biomarker validation and drug development, but also highlights toxicity risk. Future neoadjuvant clinical trials should carefully weigh these considerations for targeted therapy development in biomarker-defined TNBC.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
53 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|