Reporting Cultural Adaptation in Psychological Trials – The RECAPT criteria

Author:

Heim EvaORCID,Mewes Ricarda,Abi Ramia Jinane,Glaesmer Heide,Hall Brian,Harper Shehadeh Melissa,Ünlü Burçin,Kananian Schahryar,Kohrt Brandon A.,Lechner-Meichsner Franziska,Lotzin Annett,Moro Marie Rose,Radjack Rahmeth,Salamanca-Sanabria Alicia,Singla Daisy R.,Starck Annabelle,Sturm Gesine,Tol Wietse,Weise Cornelia,Knaevelsrud Christine

Abstract

Background

There is a lack of empirical evidence on the level of cultural adaptation required for psychological interventions developed in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies to be effective for the treatment of common mental disorders among culturally and ethnically diverse groups. This lack of evidence is partly due to insufficient documentation of cultural adaptation in psychological trials. Standardised documentation is needed in order to enhance empirical and meta-analytic evidence.

Process

A “Task force for cultural adaptation of mental health interventions for refugees” was established to harmonise and document the cultural adaptation process across several randomised controlled trials testing psychological interventions for mental health among refugee populations in Germany. Based on the collected experiences, a sub-group of the task force developed the reporting criteria presented in this paper. Thereafter, an online survey with international experts in cultural adaptation of psychological interventions was conducted, including two rounds of feedback.

Results

The consolidation process resulted in eleven reporting criteria to guide and document the process of cultural adaptation of psychological interventions in clinical trials. A template for documenting this process is provided. The eleven criteria are structured along A) Set-up; B) Formative research methods; C) Intervention adaptation; D) Measuring outcomes and implementation.

Conclusions

Reporting on cultural adaptation more consistently in future psychological trials will hopefully improve the quality of evidence and contribute to examining the effect of cultural adaptation on treatment efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Reference96 articles.

1. Community cognitive interviewing to inform local adaptations of an e-mental health intervention in Lebanon

2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

3. Applied Mental Health Research (AMHR) Group at Johns Hopkins University. (2013). The DIME Program Research Model: Design, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation. https://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/global-mental-health/resource-materials/design-implementation-monitoring-and-evaluation-dime/

4. A client-generated psychometric instrument: The development of ‘PSYCHLOPS’

5. Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3