Affiliation:
1. University of Münster (Germany)
Abstract
Abstract
First of all, I would like to make clear that this paper is meant as a response to the attack against the Mixed
Game Model (Weigand 2010) launched by Harrissians in their articles of the Special
Issue of this journal (2018, 1). When I became aware of the fact that against their
dogmatic position no argument can take effect, I decided not to take part directly in such a pseudo-debate but to respond in a
discussion article in the next issue (see the preface of the special issue). I am writing this discussion article not in the
futile hope of changing the minds of Harrissian hardliners, but because I feel obliged to the other contributors of the Special
Issue who made a plea for the MGM. Moreover, I feel obliged to the readers of this journal to defend my position regarding basic
issues of linguistics. I’ll focus on central points and refer to my book on “Dialogue: The Mixed Game” for details.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies
Reference35 articles.
1. Communicative Ethics
2. Necessary Coupling. Review of Harris’s ‘The Language Connection: Philosophy and Linguistics’ and ‘The Origin of Language’;Crystal;The Times Higher Education Supplement,1997
3. Sign making in dialogue
4. The Integrationist Critique of Orthodox Linguistics;Harris,1990
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献