Abstract
Abstract
Comparisons of plant names in Karenic languages reveal that names that can be traced back to Proto-Karen belong to plants that grow in temperate zones, such as bamboo, banyan, and mango. The names for coconut and palmyra palm, which are typical tropical plants, cannot be traced back to Proto-Karen and are borrowings. This suggests that Proto-Karen was spoken in a temperate zone. Meanwhile, the highest diversity of Karenic languages is observed in the area from southern Shan State to Kayah State and northern Karen State in Myanmar. Thus, as per linguistic migration theory, this area may have been the homeland of Karenic languages. Furthermore, the area largely has temperate zones. Hence, we can assume that the homeland of Karenic languages was in this area.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Reference61 articles.
1. The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective;Blust;Asian Perspectives,1984
2. East and Southeast Asia;Bradley,2007
3. Proto-Karen: A reanalysis;Burling;Occasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics,1969