Affiliation:
1. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Abstract
Abstract
This article presents the results of three studies on practices in and attitudes toward replication in empirical
translation and interpreting studies. The first study reports on a survey in which 52 researchers in translation and interpreting
with experience in empirical research answered questions about their practices in and attitudes toward replication. The survey
data were complemented by a bibliometric study of publications indexed in the Bibliography of Interpreting and Translation (BITRA)
(Franco Aixelá 2001–2019) that explicitly stated in the title or abstract that they
were derived from a replication. In a second bibliometric study, a conceptual replication of Yeung’s (2017) study on the acceptance of replications in neuroscience journals was conducted by analyzing 131
translation and interpreting journals. The article aims to provide evidence-based arguments for initiating a debate about the need
for replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies and its implications for the development of the discipline.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Reference58 articles.
1. Towards an Investigation of Reading Modalities in/for Translation: An Exploratory Study Using Eye-Tracking Data;Alves,2011
2. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
3. Six red flags for suspect work
4. Priming, Replication, and the Hardest Science
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献