Affiliation:
1. Deakin University
2. The University of Melbourne
Abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates participants’ reflections on power relations embedded in the cultural-pragmatics of
unsourced evidentials in Persian texts. Using Fairclough’s (2013) critical discourse
analysis, we adopted Hanks’ (2018) ethnography of referential practices and Foucault’s (1980) power dynamics to analyse 16 Persian texts through follow up interviews
and focus group discussions on two opposing pairs of texts – one pair on Iranian national identity versus Persian literature, and
another on Iranian politics versus religion. Our analysis revealed that unsourced evidentials appear in Persian predominantly due
to censorship and sometimes due to deliberate use by authors (e.g., for winning an argument). Text consumers often overlook
unsourced evidentials while reflecting on politico-religious referents, such as inequalities and bigotry. This has roots in
Persian literature, religion, and politics of power embedded in the culture, and the participants’ attention to inequalities and
discriminations has roots in referential practices in current Iranian discourse.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献