Abstract
This paper examines the use of definite and indefinite noun phrases in everyday conversations in Finnish and English to establish meaning and to alter and build context in interaction. The paper shows that participants in conversation use the formal contrast between definite and indefinite NPs not only to express identifiability and non-identifiability of the referent to their addressees, but that they also use it dynamically to make claims about socially shared reality, to create referents in discourse and to build a novel identity for existing referents, to actively construct frames and create roles within them, and to reorganize the participant structure of a speech event.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Language and Linguistics
Reference40 articles.
1. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view;Chafe,1976
2. Bridging;Clark,1977
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Pragmatics of quantifiers: The case of Estonian kõik ‘all’;Journal of Pragmatics;2008-11
2. Weapons of mass destruction;Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA);2004-12-01