Affiliation:
1. Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
2. Universität Tübingen
3. Universität Erfurt
Abstract
Abstract
There is an ongoing debate on how speakers and listeners process and interpret information in a morphological
system that is very complex and not very transparent. A well-known test case is the German nominal number system. In this paper we
employ discriminative learning (e.g., Ramscar & Yarlett, 2007; Baayen et al., 2011, 2019) to test whether
discriminative learning networks can be used to better understand the processing of German number. We analyse behavioral data
obtained from a patient with primary progressive aphasia (Domahs et al., 2017), and the
unimpaired system. We test a model that implements the traditional cues borrowed from the schema approach (Köpcke, 1988, 1993; Köpcke
et al., 2021), and compare it to a model that uses segmental and phonotactic information only. Our results for the
unimpaired system demonstrate that a model based on only biphones as cues is better able to predict the number of a given
word-form than a model using structural phonological cues. We also test whether a discriminative learning model can predict the
number decisions by the aphasic patient. The results demonstrate that a biphone-based discriminative model trained on the
patient’s responses is superior to a structure-based model in approximating the patient’s behavior.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Reference72 articles.
1. Morphology-phonology interaction;Arndt-Lappe,2021
2. Stratification effects without morphological strata, syllable counting effects without counts: Modelling English stress assignment with Naive Discriminative Learning;Arndt-Lappe;Morphology,2022
3. An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.
4. Celex2;Baayen;Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia,1996