Affiliation:
1. Universidad de Sevilla
Abstract
AbstractThis article examines the verbal morphology of the Old English interlinear gloss to the Durham Collectar, attributed by almost universal consensus to Aldred of Chester-le-Street, whose earlier gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels has recently been the object of scholarly attention (Cole 2014;Fernández Cuesta & Pons-Sanz 2016,Gameson et al. 2017). This article analyses -s/-thvariation in the present indicative and imperative forms in relation to their syntactic context, in particular subject type and subject-verb adjacency, in order to assess whether the Northern Subject Rule detected byCole (2014)in Lindisfarne was also operative in Aldred’s later gloss. By means of a quantitative analysis, we find that the first constraint does not significantly affect -s/-ðvariation in the gloss and that there is insufficient context for the second. Additionally, it is argued that adjacency is a problematic variable in this text-type. We also demonstrate that there is a higher percentage of second person singular -stand -ðin the Collectar than in Lindisfarne and discuss the possible influence of standard West Saxon on the later gloss.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference75 articles.
1. Variation in subject verb concord in Early Modern English;Bailey,1989
2. Evaluating logistic mixed-effects models of corpus data;Barth,2011
3. Present Indicative Plural Concord in Brittonic and Early English1
4. The Lindisfarne s/ö problem1
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献