Abstract
Abstract
This article studies the various uses of a Dutch thetic and sentence-focus construction, viz. the Syntactic
Inversion with Filler Insertion Construction (henceforth: SIFIC), e.g. Er loopt een man over straat (‘There is a
man walking across the street’). The article investigates whether theticity and sentence-focus are semantically encoded meanings
of the SIFIC or pragmatically inferred senses. SIFIC tokens (N = 750) were extracted from the Dutch SoNaR Corpus
and annotated for five factors. The analysis shows that the SIFIC can have information-structural uses that are diametrically
opposed to theticity and sentence-focus, i.e. topic-comment structure, predicate-focus articulation and categorical judgment. It
is argued that theticity and sentence-focus can therefore not be regarded as the encoded semantics of the SIFIC, but should rather
be analyzed as default senses of the construction. Based on similar cross-linguistic findings the article takes issue with the
assumption that most languages have dedicated thetic and sentence-focus constructions.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Reference132 articles.
1. Valenzdiversifikationen: Was ist Thetikvalenz?
2. Zur Architektur von Informationsautonomie: Thetik und Kategorik. Wie sind sie linguistisch zu verorten und zu unterscheiden?;Abraham,2020
3. Thetics and Categoricals
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献