Abstract
Abstract
Taking an authorial stance is essential in academic writing but remains a challenge for novice researchers,
especially EFL/ESL writers. This study explores how authors of English and Arabic research article discussions employ evaluative
language resources while commenting on their results. To this end, the study investigated the employment of Engagement resources
within Appraisal Theory (Martin & White 2005). The findings exhibited a great
divergence between the two language groups as Arabic discussions relied more on Contracting strategies, which indicate the
tendency to close down the space for dialogic alternatives, while their English counterparts preferred Expanding resources, which
open up the dialogic space for alternative voices. The study, therefore, bears some pedagogical implications for L2 learners.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献