Affiliation:
1. Justus Liebig University Giessen
Abstract
This article presents the findings of a cross-linguistic survey of tense. In an areally and genetically balanced sample, 318 languages were investigated for whether they have tense and, if so, how they partition the timeline with respect to the deictic centre. Three quarters of the languages have tense: the majority partition the timeline into three sections: before, during and after the deictic centre (effectively past, present and future tense). Those languages with only two tenses most commonly have future/nonfuture tense. Interestingly, a group of languages have only one tense, the majority of them the future. This might indicate that there is a stronger motivation for the future tense to grammaticalize than for other tenses, mirroring a real/unreal world divide: real world events are easier to characterize through aspect than events that are yet to happen, which might create a need for a device that locates an event in future time.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Reference78 articles.
1. The Achumawi Language
2. Becker, Richard A. & Allan R. Wilks. 2015. Original S code; R version by Ray Brownrigg. mapdata: Extra Map Databases. R package version 2.2–5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mapdata
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Verb marking and classification of adjectival predicates in creoles;Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages;2024-02-27
2. Saipanese English;Varieties of English Around the World;2023-06-21
3. The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2021-12-06
4. The Habitual Past in Amele, Papua New Guinea;Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology;2020-04-01
5. Order in the creole speech community;Language Ecology;2019-06-12