Affiliation:
1. Université de la Réunion & C.N.R.S., Paris
Abstract
Summary
This article attempts to rehabilitate Hugo Schuchardt (1842–1927) as a general linguist. It tries to show that the many polemics of his take all their source in a rejection of a reifying vision of language, be it his critique of the ‘organicist conception of language’ (largely associated with the work of August Schleicher), of the ‘blind action of phonetic laws concerning any given dialect’ (a position held by the Neogrammarians), or of the Saussurean dichotomies. Instead, Schuchardt prefers a conception of language as a dynamic activity in which the individual and society as well as the mixture of languages play a central part. As a result, Schuchardt’s interest in and focus on (what appeared to many of his contemporaries as) marginal phenomena (creoles, pidgins, language contacts, universal language) is not a matter of accident, but directly related to his permanent and rigorous questioning of the dominant tenets in the field, a position he thought to be essential to any progress in linguistic science.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,History,Language and Linguistics
Reference55 articles.
1. Due lettere glottologiche;Ascoli,1886–88
2. Schuchardt l’incompris ou du bon usage de la mixité des langues;Baggioni,1983
3. Géographie linguistique et dialectologie ramane dans le débat autour des lois phonétiques;Baggioni;Linguistique comparée et typologie des langues romanes,1985
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Notes;Signs of Difference;2019-06-27
2. Coda: Avenues of Inquiry;Signs of Difference;2019-06-27
3. Scales and Scale-Making: Connecting Sites;Signs of Difference;2019-06-27
4. Dynamics of Change in Differentiation;Signs of Difference;2019-06-27
5. German-Hungarians in Hungary;Signs of Difference;2019-06-27