Affiliation:
1. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
2. Radboud University
Abstract
Abstract
Incremental comprehension of head-final constructions can reveal structural attachment preferences for ambiguous
phrases. This study investigates how temporarily ambiguous PPs are processed in Dutch verb-final constructions. In De
aannemer heeft op het dakterras bespaard/gewerkt ‘The contractor has on the roof terrace saved/worked’, the PP is
locally ambiguous between attachment as argument and as adjunct. This ambiguity is resolved by the sentence-final verb. In a
self-paced reading task, we manipulated the argument/adjunct status of the PP, and its position relative to the verb. While we
found no reading-time differences between argument and adjunct PPs, we did find that transitive verbs, for which the PP is an
argument, were read more slowly than intransitive verbs, for which the PP is an adjunct. We suggest that Dutch parsers have a
preference for adjunct attachment of preverbal PPs, and discuss our findings in terms of incremental parsing models that aim to
minimize costly reanalysis.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献