Affiliation:
1. KU Leuven
2. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO)
3. Université de Liège
4. F.R.S.-FNRS
Abstract
Abstract
This paper explores the rich diversity in structural possibilities that are available for (simple) nominal
expressions in Australian languages. First, I identify a number of construction types found across a 50 language sample, which may
be recognised by using a restricted set of parameters. I show that an important factor is whether a given parameter (such as word
order) is generalised or displayed only by some word classes. Second, I develop a four-way typology based on how the construction
types cluster in individual languages. Two types are described to some extent in the literature, but I provide a more detailed
characterisation: one mostly has flexible, non-phrasal expressions and the other mostly rigid noun phrases. The other two types
have not been described as such. One mostly has flexible phrases, which combine internal flexibility with phrasal case marking,
and the other has distinct construction types depending on the type of modifier.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
87 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The revitalization of the sleeping Tasmanian Aboriginal languages palawa kani;The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages;2023-06-13
2. Wajarri;The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages;2023-06-13
3. Ngumpin-Yapa languages;The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages;2023-06-13
4. The Wati (Western Desert) subgroup of Pama-Nyungan;The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages;2023-06-13
5. Noongar;The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages;2023-06-13