Affiliation:
1. University of Liverpool
Abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates how Brexit was de/legitimised by different Labour actors in a corpus of texts published
after the referendum (2016–2020). It thus contributes an intra-party perspective to understanding discursive
dynamics of European (dis)integration by building on the notorious ‘European question’ historically debated inside Labour and on
the polysemy of Brexit constructed by/reflected in such discourses. The analysis, conducted at lexical-semantic and
discursive-pragmatic levels, points to distinct strategic, ideological and ambivalent forms of de/legitimation of Brexit in the
discourses of Labour. While strategic and ambivalent de/legitimation point to the Brexit debate being mainly driven by political
communication logics, ideological de/legitimation highlights a deeper struggle inside Labour over EU-rope, especially in relation
to international vs. national conceptualisations of socialism. While EU-rope was de/legitimised (and Brexit legitimised) by
advocates of ‘socialism in one country’, reverse stances tended to be adopted by supporters of ‘international socialism’.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献