Abstract
Abstract
This article presents the findings of a study on the development of case assignment in Icelandic as a second
language within the context of Processability Theory (PT) and compares them with previous PT studies on the development of case in
L2 German, Russian, and Serbian. We argue that initially, learners are only able to appropriately mark subjects and objects in
canonical positions (e.g., subjnom v objacc
). Later they are also able to mark arguments with the
appropriate case in sentences that deviate from canonical word order (e.g., objacc/dat v subjnom
).
In order to examine the case development in L2 Icelandic, 148 learners were asked to fill in the blanks of sentences with missing
core arguments. Our results replicate for the most part the previous findings for L2 German, Russian, and Serbian. As such, the
present study adds to the typological plausibility of PT as a framework that predicts and explains developmental sequences.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献