Affiliation:
1. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
2. University of Tübingen
Abstract
Abstract
In the Proto-Quechuan lexicon, many two-segment phonetic substrings recur in semantically related roots, even
though they are not independent morphemes. Such elements may have been morphemes before the Proto-Quechuan stage (i.e., in
Pre-Proto-Quechuan). On the other hand, this may simply be due to chance, or to phonesthesia. In this paper, we introduce the
Crosslinguistic Colexification Network Clustering (CCNC) algorithm, as well as an accompanying test statistic, which allow us to
evaluate our claims against a neutral standard of semantic relatedness (the CLICS2 database; List et al. 2018). We obtain very strong statistical evidence that there are hitherto unexplained
recurrent elements within Proto-Quechuan roots, but not within roots reconstructed for Proto-Aymaran, the proto-language of a
neighboring language family whose members are otherwise structurally very similar to Proto-Quechuan, and which has therefore long
been considered an obvious candidate for deep shared ancestry. Some of these elements are explainable as phonesthemes, but most
appear to reflect archaic Quechuan morphology. These findings are consistent with an emerging picture of the early
Quechuan-Aymaran contact relationship in which Quechuan structure was reformatted on the Aymaran template.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference66 articles.
1. La relación Quechua-Aru: Perspectivas para la separación del léxico;Adelaar;Revista Andina,1986
2. Comentarios a Martha Hardman y Bruce Mannheim;Adelaar;Revista Andina,1987
3. The vicissitudes of directional affixes in Tarma (Northern Junin) Quechua;Adelaar,2006
4. Inverse markers in Andean languages: A comparative view;Adelaar,2009
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Northern Aymaran Toponymy, Revisited;International Journal of American Linguistics;2023-10-01