Affiliation:
1. European Commission, Joint Research Center
2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Institute for European Studies
Abstract
AbstractThis study is aimed at unveiling the implicit assumptions underlying the language of EU policy-making, drawing on Hannah Arendt’s critique of modernity. It conducts a critical metaphor analysis of strategic EU policy documents from 1985 to 2014 to reveal the extent to which EU policy-making, by relentlessly focusing on the ‘competitiveness, growth, and jobs’ narrative, relies on modern conceptual frameworks. These are characterized by the prominence of rationality and causality, at the expense of sense of purpose, reality and meaning, which is revealed through the validation of four metaphorical keys. These are (i)sensitive inversion, i.e.economic agents are sensitiveandhumans are functional; (ii)size matters, i.e.big is better than smallandone is better than many; (iii)deficit framing, i.e.potential is lockedandpresent is broken/future is bright; and (iv)speed is of the essence, i.e.the world moves fastandwe must hurry up.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献