Abstract
Abstract
Sign languages seem not to be amenable to traditional historical reconstruction via the comparative method, making
it difficult to replicate the successes achieved in the diachronic study of spoken languages. We propose to alleviate this
difficulty with an alternative approach that draws upon nonarbitrariness and biomechanics, especially the drive for reducing
articulatory effort. We offer a demonstration of this approach, which can add confirmation to known relationships between sign
languages and new evidence in support of suspected relationships, helping to fill in a methodological gap in the diachronic study
of sign languages.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Reference264 articles.
1. Getting the Upper Hand on Sign Language Families: Historical Analysis and AnnotationMethods
2. Meaning on the one and on the other hand
3. 35. Language contact and borrowing
4. Standardization of Sign Languages
5. Gesti linguistici: La labializzazione in LIS;Ajello;Quaderni della Sezione di Glottologia e Linguistica – Dipartimento di Studu Medivali e Moderni – Università degli Studi «G. D’Annunzio» di Chieti,1997