Affiliation:
1. Ludwigsburg University of Education, Chemistry Education, Reuteallee 46, 71634 Ludwigsburg, Germany
2. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Chemistry Education, Butenandtstr. 5-13, Haus D, 81377 Munich, Germany
Abstract
In the past decades, society in general has become strongly diverse. This change also affects schools. As a result, learning groups cannot be seen as homogeneous and taught in this way. One of the challenges is students' linguistic skills. Dealing with different linguistic competencies should not only be a focus of formal education in schools but supported by non-formal education such as student laboratories. Thus, there is a need for practical examples that are effective for teaching and learning of diverse groups of students and enables them to be an active part of the learning process. At the Ludwigsburg University of Education, learning settings for student laboratories that enable active participation for all students irrespective of their linguistic competencies are developed and implemented following the model of Participatory Action Research in three cycles. In a cyclical approach, language-sensitive and language-supportive learning materials are developed, implemented, and evaluated focusing on different chemical contents. Qualitative data are collected during the experimentation phase using a semi-structured observation sheet. In three phases, we evaluated semi-structured observations of eight learning groups of different grade levels and school types with a total of 163 students. The observations are analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis. The results show an optimal composition of approved methods, tools, and activities as succesful examples. Furthermore, interdependence between different factors could be identified that have positive relations with active participation of all students.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Subject
Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Reference73 articles.
1. Affeldt F., Weitz K., Siol A., Markic S. and Eilks I., (2015), A Non-Formal Student Laboratory as a Place for Innovation in Education for Sustainability for All Students, Educ. Sci. , 5 (3), 238–254
2. Affeldt F., Tolppanen S., Aksela M. and Eilks I., (2017), The potential of the non-formal educational sector for supporting chemistry learning and sustainability education for all students – a joint perspective from two cases in Finland and Germany, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 18 (1), 13–25
3. Affeldt F., Markic S. and Eilks I., (2019), Students’ use of graded learning aids for inquiry learning, Chem. Action , ( 114 ), 28–33
4. Blanchard M. R., Southerland S. A., Osborne J. W., Sampson V. D., Annetta L. A. and Granger E. M., (2010), Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? a quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction: Guided Inquiry and Verification Laboratory Instruction, Sci. Educ. , 94 (4), 577–616
5. Booth A., (2003), Inclusion in the City: Selection, Schooling and Community, in Potts P. (ed.) Inclusion in the city: selection, schooling and community , RoutledgeFalmer
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献