Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions

Published:2024 Issue:13 Volume:11 Page:3005-3010
ISSN:2051-6347
Container-title:Materials Horizons
language:en
Short-container-title:Mater. Horiz.

Author:

Rost Nathanne Cristina Vilela¹^ORCID,Said Maha¹^ORCID,Gharib Mustafa¹^ORCID,Lévy Raphaël¹^ORCID,Boem Federico²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Université Sorbonne Paris Nord and Université Paris Cité, INSERM, LVTS, F-75018 Paris, France

2. University of Twente, Philosophy Section, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands

Abstract

Material science publications are the outcome of research, but they can contain errors. We advocate for post publication peer review as a way to collectively improve self-correction of science.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Link

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/MH/D3MH01781H

Reference55 articles.

1. Nanomedicine literature: the vicious cycle of reproducing the irreproducible

2. Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, et al. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science [Internet]. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press; 2019 [cited 2023 May 22]. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303

3. The Issue of Reliability and Repeatability of Analytical Measurement in Industrial and Academic Nanomedicine

4. P.Rossi , The birth of modern science , Blackwell , Oxford; Malden, Mass , 2001 , p. 276

5. R. K.Merton , The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations , University of Chicago Press , Chicago , 1973 , p. 605