Integrating informal learning in college general chemistry courses
-
Published:2022
Issue:4
Volume:23
Page:913-929
-
ISSN:1109-4028
-
Container-title:Chemistry Education Research and Practice
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
Author:
Heider Emily C.1ORCID, Simkins Kylee1, McLaughlin Jared1, Simmons Vanessa2, Long Ruth L.1, Coulter Abigail1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemistry, Utah Valley University, 800 W University Pkwy, Orem, UT 84058, USA 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, 4111 Libra Drive Orlando, FL 32816, USA
Abstract
Informal learning (IL) venues such as museums, zoos, scouting, national parks, and community activities are increasingly recognized for their important role in enhancing the public understanding of science. Many benefits to students who participate in rich informal learning experiences are reported in the literature, including improvements in scientific reasoning skills, percentages of students enrolling in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) majors, and completion of college degrees. The research reported herein analyzes potential benefits of including informal learning experiences in college general chemistry courses, using the School Museum Learning Framework to structure the informal learning experiences. Assessment of outcomes of the informal learning activities are scaffolded upon the U.S. National Research Council's Strands of Informal Learning. Gains in science learning as they related to formal chemistry course content were quantified using pre- and post-assessment measures. Additional outcomes quantifying student motivation were evaluated using the Science Motivation Questionnaire. Results show improvement in some course-related outcomes as well as affective expressions of motivation by students who participated in informal learning experiences.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Subject
Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Reference40 articles.
1. Albaum G., (1997), The Likert Scale Revisited: An Alternate Version, J. Market Res. Soc. , 39 , 331–348 2. Amey, J., Fletcher M. D., Fletcher R. V., Jones A., Roberts E. W. and Roberts I. O., (2008), Meet the Molecules in Chocolate: Informal Opportunities for Building Thematic Molecular Models with Children, J. Chem. Ed. , 85 , 1361–1364 3. Bandura A., (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , Prentice-Hall, Englwood Cliffs 4. Bell P., Lewenstein B., Shouse A. and Feder M., (2009), Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits , Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press 5. Brody M. and Hall R., (2002), Park visitors’ understandings, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA, Int. J. Sci. Educ. , 24 , 1119–1141
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|