Affiliation:
1. Center for Computing in Science Education, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway
2. Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway
Abstract
Sensemaking is an important way of learning and engaging in science. Research has shown that sensemaking activities, such as questioning, hypothesizing, and model building, are pivotal in developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills in science education. This paper investigates the role of computational simulations in facilitating sensemaking in chemistry education, specifically examining how these simulations can sustain the sensemaking process. Through a detailed case study in a physical chemistry course, we explore the interplay between students' real-world experiences, theoretical knowledge, and computational simulations. This analysis reveals that computational simulations, by providing interactive and visual representations of chemical phenomena, can create a conducive environment for sensemaking, where students actively engage in exploring and resolving conceptual uncertainties. Based on these results, we argue that computational tools, when effectively integrated into educational settings, can facilitate sensemaking in science education.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Reference67 articles.
1. Ardac D. and Sezen A. H., (2002), Effectiveness of Computer-Based Chemistry Instruction in Enhancing the Learning of Content and Variable Control Under Guided Versus Unguided Conditions, J. Sci. Educ. Technol. , 11 , 39–48 10.1023/A:1013995314094
2. Bassey M., (1999), Case study research in educational settings, Doing qualitative research in educational settings , Philadelphia: Open University Press, Buckingham [England]
3. Berlin D. and White A., (2010), Computer Simulations and the Transition from Concrete Manipulation of Objects to Abstract Thinking in Elementary School Mathematics, School Sci. Math. , 86 , 468–479 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1986.tb11643.x
4. Braithwaite D. W. and Sprague L., (2021), Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Knowledge, and Metacognition in Routine and Nonroutine Problem Solving, Cognitive Sci. , 45 , e13048 10.1111/cogs.13048
5. Brant G., Hooper E. and Sugrue B., (1991), Which Comes First the Simulation or the Lecture? J. Educ. Comput. Res. , 7 , 469–481