On the prevalence of alternative conceptions on acid–base chemistry among secondary students: insights from cognitive and confidence measures

Author:

Hoe Kai Yee12,Subramaniam R.12

Affiliation:

1. Nanyang Technological Univeristy – National Institute of Education

2. Singapore

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of alternative conceptions (ACs) on acid–base chemistry harbored by grade 9 students in Singapore. The ACs were obtained by the development and validation of a 4-tier diagnostic instrument. It is among the very few studies in the science education literature that have focused on examining results based also on measures used in the educational psychology literature. The results indicate that the students harbor a range of ACs of varying strengths in relation to the properties of acids and bases, strengths of acids and bases, pH, neutralization, indicators, and sub-microscopic views of acids and bases. The 25-item instrument uncovered 30 ACs. A novel insight from this study is that when students are presented with a test item with all incorrect answer and reason responses but with a blank space for them to fill up their own answer and reason if they disagree with any of these responses, hardly any chose to do so. ACs were also identified from this question. Overall, the results reiterate the utility of the 4-tier format for identifying ACs and getting some indication of their strengths.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference48 articles.

1. Artdej R., Ratanaroutai T., Coll R. K. and Thongpanchang T., (2010), Thai Grade 11 students' alternative conceptions for acid–base chemistry, Res. Sci. & Tech. Educ., 28(2), 167–183

2. Banerjee A. C., (1991), Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 13(4), 487–494

3. Caleon I. and Subramaniam R., (2010), Do students know what they know and what they don't know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students' alternative conceptions, Res. Sci. Educ., 40(3), 313–337

4. Cetin-Dindar A. and Geban O., (2011), Development of a three-tier test to assess high school students' understanding of acids and bases, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 15, 600–604

5. Chiu M. H., (2004), An investigation of exploring mental models and causes of secondary school students' misconceptions in acids-bases, particle theory, and chemical equilibrium. Annual Report to the National Science Council in Taiwan (in Chinese) Taiwan: National Science Council. Quoted in Chiu, M. H., (2007), A national survey of students' conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 29(4), 421–452

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3