Developing critical thinking skills using the Science Writing Heuristic in the chemistry laboratory

Author:

Stephenson N. S.1234,Sadler-McKnight N. P.1234

Affiliation:

1. University of the West Indies

2. Department of Chemistry

3. Mona

4. Jamaica

Abstract

The Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) laboratory approach is a teaching and learning tool which combines writing, inquiry, collaboration and reflection, and provides scaffolding for the development of critical thinking skills. In this study, the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) was used to measure the critical thinking skills of first year general chemistry students who were instructed using the SWH approach and first year general chemistry students who received traditional (TRAD) laboratory instruction A quasi experimental pretest–posttest design involving the use of matched groups was used to assess differences in critical thinking between the two groups. Students in the SWH group had significantly higher total critical thinking scores over their traditional counterparts. The results indicate that the SWH approach shows efficacy in improving students' critical thinking skills over the traditional approach.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. Abrami P., Bernard R., Borokhovhovski E., Wade A., Surkes M., Tamim R. and Zhang D., (2008), Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: a stage 1 meta-analysis, Rev. Educ. Res., 78(4), 1102–1134

2. Andrews J. and Higson H., (2008), Graduate employability, ‘soft skills’ versus ‘hard’ business knowledge: a European study, High. Educ. Eur., 33(4), 411–422

3. Association of American Colleges and Universities, (2005), Liberal education outcomes: a preliminary report on student achievement in college, retrieved from: http://www.aacu.org/publications/web_publications.cfm

4. Association of American Colleges and Universities, (2013), It takes more than a major: employer priorities for college learning and student success, retrieved from: http://www.aacu.org

5. Bok D., (2006), Our underachieving colleges: a candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Cited by 66 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3