A systematic review of learning progressions for the concept of matter in science education

Author:

Shi Guanxue1ORCID,Bi Hualin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan, Shandong 250014, China

Abstract

This study evaluated recent advances in learning progressions for the concept of matter (LPCM) and explored trends by reviewing the literature on the topic published between 2005 and 2021. A total of 21 studies were reviewed. Fifteen studies were devoted to developing LPCM of varying spans and grain sizes. There were six follow-up studies based on LPCM, which were divided into two categories: curriculum research and items design. This study explored the value of the existing research on constructing learning progressions, which focused on the challenges in using LP research to specify the content of the curriculum. It analyzed the terms used to represent the big ideas, the upper anchor, progress variables, the expression of intermediate level, the characteristics of stepping stones and grades/school levels. There were some differences among individual studies on constructing LPCM in the above aspects, which makes combining LPCM difficult. These studies have also reached some consensus: the multidimensional structure of the matter concept has been empirically confirmed. These studies on the development and validation of LPCM had the following characteristics: (a) the construction intention for LPCM focuses on the development of knowledge; (b) the choice of progress variables depends on experience; and (c) the developed LPCMs are mostly linear. These constructed LPCM have not been widely applied in practice. In order for research in this field to better contribute to the curriculum and instruction, we also proposed some suggestions for future research.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference68 articles.

1. Alonzo A. and Gotwals A., (2012), Learning progression in science , Rotterdam: Sense Publishers

2. Amin T., Smith C. L. and Wiser M., (2014), Student conceptions and conceptual change: three overlapping phases of research, in Lederman N. (ed.), Handbook of Science Education Research , New York: Routledge, pp. 57–81

3. Ananiadou K. and Claro M., (2009), 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries, OECD Education Working Papers , 41 10.1787/19939019

4. Black P., Wilson M. and Yao S. Y., (2011), Road maps for learning: a guide to the navigation of learning progressions, Meas.-Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. , 9 (2–3), 71–123 10.1080/15366367.2011.591654

5. Catley K., Lehrer R. and Reiser B., (2005), Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution, Paper Commissioned for the Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement Center for Education, National Research Council , 1–67

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3