Investigating the viability of a competency-based, qualitative laboratory assessment model in first-year undergraduate chemistry

Author:

Pullen Reyne1234,Thickett Stuart C.1234ORCID,Bissember Alex C.1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Physical Sciences – Chemistry

2. University of Tasmania

3. Hobart

4. Australia

Abstract

In chemistry curricula, both the role of the laboratory program and the method of assessment used are subject to scrutiny and debate. The ability to identify clearly defined competencies for the chemistry laboratory program is crucial, given the numerous other disciplines that rely on foundation-level chemistry knowledge and practical skills. In this report, we describe the design, implementation, results, and feedback obtained on a competency-based assessment model recently introduced into the first-year laboratory program at an Australian university. Previously, this laboratory program was assessed via a quantitative, criterion-referenced assessment model. At the core of this new model was a set of competency criteria relating to skills-acquisition, chemical knowledge and application of principles, safety in the laboratory, as well as professionalism and teamwork. By design, these criteria were aligned with the learning outcomes of the course and the degree itself, as well as local accrediting bodies. Qualitative and quantitative feedback from students (and staff) obtained before and after the implementation of this new model suggested this approach provided an enhanced learning experience enabling a greater focus on the acquisition of fundamental laboratory skills and techniques.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference33 articles.

1. Australian Learning and Teaching Council, (2011), Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Project (Science) , retrieved 2015, from http://www.acds-tlcc.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2015/02/altc_standards_SCIENCE_240811_v3_final.pdf

2. Bailey R. and Garner M., (2010), Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices, Teach. High. Educ. , 15 (2), 187–198

3. Baranyai and Prinsley, (2015), Stem skills in the workforce: What do employer's want? Occasional Paper Series, Issue 9, Office of the Chief Scientist, Australian Government, Canberra

4. Bennett S. W. and O’Neale K., (1998), Skills development and practical work in chemistry, Univ. Chem. Educ. , 2 , 58–62

5. Biggs J. B., (2002), ‘Aligning the curriculum to promote good learning’, constructive alignment in action: Imaginative curriculum symposium , LTSN Generic Centre

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3