Determination of Anatolian Honeybee Biodiversity by Wing Characters

Author:

Kekeçoğlu MeralORCID,Bir Songül,Acar Merve Kambur

Abstract

In this study, we report that there were five different subspecies and three different ecotypes defined so far in Türkiye, which has a rich biodiversity in terms of honeybee subspecies. However, recently, it has been thought that the current biodiversity is in danger of extinction due to the commercial queen bee supply and the migratory beekeeping activities from a single source. This study uses the morphometric method to reveal the current status of honeybee biodiversity in Türkiye. For this purpose, a total of 3186 worker bees were studied by samplings from 19 different provinces to represent the honeybee races and ecotypes distributed in Türkiye. We made wing preparations and established 19 landmarks on the right forewings using the BAB BsPro200 program. The program automatically obtained the wing’s metrics’ angle, length, and index values via these 19 landmarks. We used Discriminant function analysis to determine intragroup and intergroup variations by taking the colony averages from data obtained from 31 morphological characters. Given the canonical discriminant function analysis and UPGMA dendrogram, Zonguldak, Düzce, Sakarya, Artvin, Ardahan, and Trabzon constituted a group, and Edirne, Kilis, Van, and Isparta formed a separate group. Hakkari, Kahramanmaraş, and Ordu provinces formed a separate line together. On the other hand, the group centers of Kars and Kırklareli, two different ends of Türkiye, overlapped and formed a close line with Isparta. As a result, this study revealed that, although the protection measures taken at the local level effectively protected the honeybee biodiversity, these measures are insufficient.

Publisher

Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana

Subject

Insect Science

Reference58 articles.

1. Adam, B. (1954). Bee breeding. Bee World, 35: 4-13.

2. Adam, B. (1983). In search of the best strains of bees. Hebden Bridge: Northern Bee Books, 206 p.

3. Alpatov, W.W. (1929). Biometrical studies on variation and races of the honeybee Apis mellifera. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 4: 1-58.

4. Alpatov, W.W. (1948). The races of honeybees and their use in agriculture. Sredi Prirodi, 4: 1-65.

5. Awetisjan, G.A. (1978). Selection of Carpathian bees. In G.A. Awetisjan, W.A. Gubin & I.K. Davydenko (Eds.), International beekeeping congress (pp. 366-371). Bucharest: Apiculture, Apimondia Publishing House.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Investigation of Some Quality Criteria in Chestnut Honey of Düzce Province;Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi;2023-12-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3