Author:
Udayakumar Amala,Anjanappa Raghavendra,Subaharan Kesavan,Shivalingaswamy Timalapur M.
Abstract
Floral specificity is a behavior that evolved due to mutualistic interactions between the plant-pollinator community. Flowers advertise themselves using visual or chemical cues to attract pollinators and gain reproductive success through pollination. Pollinators forage for rewards such as nectar or pollen produced by the flowers. We found that an anthophorid bee, Tetralonia macroceps, foraged specifically on Argyreia cuneata flowers. No visitation was observed on the flowers of A. nervosa though both belong to Convolvulaceae. T. macroceps was the most abundant floral visitor (5.21 bees/flower/5 min) on A. cuneata and did not visit A. nervosa. Mass flowering and narrow tubular flower structure with easy access to pollen in A. cuneata were the traits that accounted for the foraging specificity of T. macroceps. The present study investigates the preference of T. macroceps for the flowers and floral extracts of A. cuneata and A. nervosa. The bee visited 10.16 flowers/5 min of A. cuneata. T. macroceps were highly attracted to the flowers of A. cuneata. No bees were attracted to A. nervosa. The floral abundance of A. cuneata was relatively higher compared to A. nervosa. Pollen analysis of foraging bees of T. macroceps revealed the selective preference towards the pollen of A. cuneata. The highest number of bees preferred the extract of A. cuneata (7.75) compared to A. nervosa (0.50) in the Y-olfactory maze. Floral extract of A. cuneata caused the highest neuronal electroantennogram (EAG) response (1.48 mV) than A. nervosa (0.36 mV). Our preliminary studies indicated the presence of specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) nonacosane (13.26%), hexatriacontane (12.06%), and beta farnesene (6.19%) observed in A. cuneata were absent in congener A. nervosa.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Reference56 articles.
1. Abrol, D.P. (2009). Plant-pollinator interactions in the context of climate change - an endangered mutualism. Journal of Palynology, 45: 1-25.
2. Armbruster, S.A., Corbet, A.J., Vey, M., Shu-Juan, L. & Shuang-Quan, H. (2013). In the right place at the right time: Parnassia resolves the herkogamy dilemma by accurate repositioning of stamens and stigmas. Annals of Botany, 113: 97-103.
3. Blight, M.M., Metayer, M.L., Delegue, M.H.P., Pickett, J.A., Poll, F.P. & Wadhams, L.J. (1997). Identification of floral volatiles involved in recognition of oilseed rape flowers, Brassica napus by Honeybees, Apis mellifera. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23: 1715-1727.
4. Bronstein, J.L., Alarcon, R. & Geber, M. (2006). The evolution of plant-insect mutualisms. New Phytologist, 172: 412-428.
5. Chittka, L. & Raine, N.E. (2006). Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Current Opinions on Plant Biology, 9: 428-35.