Contribution of Omnidirectional Flight Traps to Assess the Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Diversity in an Agroforestry System

Author:

Koch Elmo Borges A.ORCID,Silva Priscila Santos,Arnhold Alexandre,Ferraz Edie Carvalho Ribeiro,Leponce Maurice,Mariano Cléa dos Santos F.,Delabie Jacques H. Charles

Abstract

The Malaise trap is widely used for monitoring the diversity of flying insects. The omnidirectional model (Omnidirectional flight trap) is well known when hung in the understory, where it divides the sampling of these insects into two interception strata, a lower and an upper one. In general, the interest in using this trap type is because it allows to collect organisms with distinct flight behaviors to be discriminated against. Here, we investigated what information this trap can provide from samples of canopy ants and winged individuals as workers. We evaluated the sampling efficiency of the ant fauna, comparing the collection strata of this trap in a cocoa agroforestry system. To collect the ants, 40 traps were installed near an equivalent number of shading trees in a cacao plantation. A total of 374 specimens of ants belonging to 94 species or morphospecies of Formicidae were captured. Of these, 44 species were represented by alates of both sexes, while workers represented 68 species. A significant difference in the average number of ant species, both winged individuals and workers, was observed according to the trap interception stratum. A greater number of alates were collected in the upper stratum than in the lower one. An inverse pattern was observed for workers. However, we do not observe any difference according to the trap interception stratum when focusing on the whole ant diversity independently from their cast. On the contrary, the pattern of species composition comparing the two trap interception strata varied according to the ant casts. The Malaise traps are also interesting because they provide valuable information about the activity of canopy ants, such as foraging (workers) and mating flight (alates: height, orientation, time, according to the schedule of trap use).

Publisher

Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana

Reference83 articles.

1. Achterberg, K.V. (2009). Can Townes type Malaise traps be improved? Some recent developments. Entomologische Berichten, 69: 129-135.

2. Aguiar, A.P. & Santos, B.F. (2010). Discovery of potent, unsuspected sampling disparities for Malaise and Möricke traps, as shown for Neotropical Cryptini (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Insect Conservation, 14: 199-206.

3. Agosti, D.M., Alonso, L.E. & Schultz, R. (2000). Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 280p.

4. Alexander, B. (2000). Sampling methods for phlebotomine sandflies. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 14: 109-122.

5. Alonso, L.E. (2000). Ants as Indicator of Diversity. In: Agosti, D., Majer, J.D., Alonso, L.L. & Schultz, T.R. (eds) Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 280p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3