Comparing Traditional and Distance Formats of a Psychiatric Rehabilitation Course
-
Published:2016
Issue:3
Volume:30
Page:215-229
-
ISSN:2168-6653
-
Container-title:Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Rehabilitation Research Policy and Education
Author:
McCarthy Thomas P.,Accordino Michael P.,Wondolowski Erica L.,Bishop Laura
Abstract
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to discover if an online course in psychiatric rehabilitation is as successful as a traditional on-campus course in terms of content delivery and learning outcomes.Method:A traditional on-campus (n= 25) and an online (n= 17) course were compared at pretest and posttest on a measure entitled “Psychiatric Vocational Rehabilitation Knowledge and Skills Inventory.” A 4 (Skill) × 3 (Time) within-subjects analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to assess changes in the skills of process, potential, partnership, and career advancement over time.Results:The results were that scores for both formats significantly increased from Time 1 to Time 2, but one format did not perform significantly better than another. The Psychiatric Vocational Rehabilitation Knowledge and Skills Inventory was found to be a reliable measure.Conclusion:The study underscores the value of a dedicated psychiatric rehabilitation course in rehabilitation graduate education.
Publisher
Springer Publishing Company