Author:
DiGiuseppe Raymond A.,Robin Mitchell W.,Dryden Windy
Abstract
Because of the personal religious and philosophical beliefs of Albert Ellis, Rational-Emotive Therapy (RET) is often perceived as inappropriate for clients with strong religious beliefs. Three of the major irrational thought processes hypothesized by RET to be at the core of psychopathology are shown to also be inconsistent with Judeo-Christian philosophy. Therefore, it is postulated that disputing irrational beliefs and establishing more rational philosophies is also consistent with Judeo-Christian philosophy. Specific clinical strategies are suggested for working with religious clients in changing these three irrational beliefs.
Publisher
Springer Publishing Company
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Including Religion in Rational-Emotive Behavior Counseling;Counseling and Therapy - Recent Developments in Theories and Practices;2022-09-28
2. REBT with context of basic psychological needs: RESD-A Scale;Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy;2020-04-13
3. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Religious and Spiritual Clients: A Critical Perspective;Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health;2016-05-13
4. Incorporating Jewish Texts with REBT in the Treatment of Clinical Anger;Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy;2016-04-11
5. Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy;Counseling and Psychotherapy with Children and Adolescents;2015-01-27