Ethics and New Health Technologies: An Innovative Descriptive Analysis of the State of the Literature

Author:

Gietzen Luke J.1,Ogilvie Sarah J.2,Steerling Emilie3,Houston Rebecca4,Nygren Jens M.5,de Ruiter Hans-Peter6

Affiliation:

1. College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Minnesota State University – Mankato, Mankato, Minnesota, United States.

2. College of Allied Health and Nursing, Minnesota State University – Mankato, Mankato, Minnesota, United States.

3. School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University in Halmstad, Sweden.

4. College of Arts and Humanities, Minnesota State University – Mankato, Mankato, Minnesota, United States.

5. School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.

6. Glen Taylor Institute for Family and Society, College of Allied Health and Nursing, Minnesota State University – Mankato, Mankato, Minnesota, United States.

Abstract

The exponential advancement of health technologies has led to an increasing need for awareness and critical thinking about the potential unintended consequences and ethical dilemmas that may arise from using new technologies. Unfortunately, many ethical issues arise post-implementation. Few researchers preemptively consider the ethical implications of health technologies. The current study located more than 24 million articles in PubMed that discussed common health technologies. Of these, 0.07% ( n = 17,816) articles deeply considered the technology's potential ethical implications. Critical thinking and ethics are the mainstays of nursing practice. Thus, critically thinking about the potential ethical implications of relevant technologies should be at the forefront of research; we contend that this is not common practice. We hope to shed light on this issue to remind researchers to think like nurses when researching new health technologies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Nursing

Reference28 articles.

1. American Psychological Association (APA). (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association 2020: The official guide to A PA style (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.

2. Baker M. (2021, October 3). Alaska's Covid crisis, doctors must decide who lives and who dies. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/03/us/coronavirus-crisis-alaska.html?searchResultPosition=3.

3. ETHICS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

4. Belluck P. (2019, January 23). How to stop rogue gene-editing of human embryos? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/23/health/gene-editing-babies-crispr.html?searchResultPosition=1.

5. Blake N. (2016). Yes, nurses do research, and it's improving patient care. Elsevier Connect. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/yes-nurses-do-research-and-it-is-improving-patient-care.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3