A Quasi-realist Synthesis Investigating Professional Breastfeeding Support Failure

Author:

Nelson Antonia M.

Abstract

Background/Purpose:To conduct a synthesis based on a realist perspective, ­investigating how professional breastfeeding support can sometimes be ineffective and/or unsatisfactory from the viewpoint of the mother and fail to address the needs of the breastfeeding dyad.Methods:An innovative, targeted “quasi-realist” ­synthesis technique was used to explore the context of the interpersonal relationships through which professional breastfeeding intervention is delivered and identify any unintended mechanisms and/or consequences.Results:Multiple expressions of failed breastfeeding support were revealed which had a negative impact on maternal empowerment, informed decision-making, and breastfeeding self-efficacy. The overarching theme,inadequate breastfeeding information/support, was elucidated by several subthemes:giving inconsistent/contradictory advice, use of the hands-on approach, provision of insensitive care, and making parents feel scrutinized/judged. Mothers who experienced inadequate breastfeeding information/support often resorted to the mechanism ofduplicity/evasionand withdrew from seeking or following further professional advice. Finally, unintended consequences of not breastfeeding as recommended includedfeelings of guilt and a sense of failure. This was particularly true for mothers who intended to exclusively breastfeed.Implications for Practice: The findings of this unique synthesis suggest that to sustain breastfeeding support relationships and prevent unintentional consequences of inadequate support, professionals must pay more attention to the manner in which breastfeeding intervention is provided. The findings also suggest that they must strive to provide more consistent, engaging, ­sensitive, and nonjudgmental care that better meets the needs of breastfeeding dyads.

Publisher

Springer Publishing Company

Subject

General Medicine

Reference73 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3