Quantitative Comparison of US Private Employers’ Defined Benefit Plans

Author:

Niu Gao,Bishop James,Quinn John T.

Abstract

The focus of this article is to quantitatively evaluate and compare three of the most popular defined benefit plan types based on various variable assumptions. The decision of when to retire and take a pension, or being given the option to change plans, often happens only once. This makes the evaluation and comparison critical. This paper provides a numerical analysis with a broad perspective so that employees with varying career situations and retirement plans can better evaluate their financial standing. Data sources include standard economic assumptions used in valuing pension plans, as well as a survey of employer sponsored pension plans. Recent pension plans provide more flexibility by paying out pensions as a single lump sum, however, these plans generally provide lower benefits.

Publisher

Springer Publishing Company

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference20 articles.

1. Average Wage Index. (2020, August 20). Social Security Administration: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/awidevelop.html

2. Bishop, J. (2012). Current challenges for employees in private employer sponsored retirement plans. Northeast Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 129–136). Newport: NDSI.

3. Contribution volatility and public pension reform;Journal of Pension Economics & Finance,2018

4. Employee Benefits Security Administration. (2011). Fact sheet: Cash balance pension plans . https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/fact-sheets/cash-balance-pension-plans#:~:text=While%20both%20traditional%20defined%20benefit,retirement%2C%20but%20cash%20balance%20plans

5. Employee Benefits Security Administration. (2021). Private pension plan bulletin historical tables and graphs 1975–2018 . https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/EBSA/researchers/statistics/retirement-bulletins/private-pension-plan-bulletin-historical-tables-and-graphs.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3