Author:
Begum Shahina,Battala Madhusudana,Chalmiers Morgen A.,Prusty Ranjan Kumar,Dixit Anvita,Johns Nicole E.,Ghule Mohan,Saggurti Niranjan,Silverman Jay,Averbach Sarah,Raj Anita
Abstract
This study aimed to assess couple concordance in attitudes toward intimate partner violence (IPV) and its association with physical IPV against women. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1,201 nonsterilized women aged 18–29 years and their husbands. It was found that husbands were significantly more likely (69.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.3%, 72.5%) to justify IPV than wives (56.5%, 95% CI: 53.7%, 59.3%). Couples who both hold attitudes justifying IPV against women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.57%–8.00%) and couples where women hold these attitudes, but men do not (AOR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.18–7.28), were more likely to report male-perpetrated IPV against women in the prior 12 months.
Publisher
Springer Publishing Company
Subject
Law,Clinical Psychology,Health (social science),Social Psychology,Gender Studies