Affiliation:
1. Ryazan branch of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya. Kikoty
2. Tyumen State University
Abstract
This monograph sheds light on the problem of assessing and compensating for harm caused by damage to a citizen’s health. The author notes that when mentioning such harm, a modern civil scientist leads himself into a situation of “scientific dead end”, stating the special, extraordinary value of the basic intangible benefits of an individual and at the same time refusing to attempt to justify the parameters for its full and effective compensation. The stated approach fits into the formula “not to evaluate cannot be compensated”, constructed by analogy with the expression known to everyone from childhood “to execute cannot be pardoned”, where the comma is set according to the prevailing doctrinal views.
As a means of solving the identified problems, the author proposed a conceptual approach based on giving legal significance to manifestations of damage to a citizen’s health, considered in their direct, physical meaning. The monograph formulates the concept of physical harm and defines the prerequisites for constructing an optimal regime for legal regulation of its assessment and compensation.
Intended for teaching staff, researchers, individuals studying in educational institutions of higher education in legal specialties (areas of training), and anyone interested in the problems of the development of domestic tort law.
Reference150 articles.
1. Авдеев А.И., Прутовых В.В. Современное законодательство как ос-нова для определения «Вред здоровью» // Дальневосточный медицинский журнал. 2021. № 3. С. 80–82., Avdeev A.I., Prutovyh V.V. Sovremennoe zakonodatel'stvo kak os-nova dlya opredeleniya «Vred zdorov'yu» // Dal'nevostochnyy medicinskiy zhurnal. 2021. № 3. S. 80–82.
2. Александрова Е.А., Хабибуллина А.Р. Методология оценки качества жизни, связанного со здоровьем с использованием опросника EQ-5D-3L // Российский медицинский журнал. 2019. Т. 25. №. 4. С. 202–209., Aleksandrova E.A., Habibullina A.R. Metodologiya ocenki kachestva zhizni, svyazannogo so zdorov'em s ispol'zovaniem oprosnika EQ-5D-3L // Rossiyskiy medicinskiy zhurnal. 2019. T. 25. №. 4. S. 202–209.
3. Андреев В.К. Существо нематериальных благ и их защита // Жур-нал российского права. 2014. № 3. С. 27–33., Andreev V.K. Suschestvo nematerial'nyh blag i ih zaschita // Zhur-nal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 3. S. 27–33.
4. Антимонов Б.С. К вопросу о понятии и значении причинной связи в гражданском праве // Труды научной сессии Всесоюзного института юридических наук, 1–6 июля 1946 г. М.: Юрид. изд-во МЮ СССР, 1948. С. 62–79., Antimonov B.S. K voprosu o ponyatii i znachenii prichinnoy svyazi v grazhdanskom prave // Trudy nauchnoy sessii Vsesoyuznogo instituta yuridicheskih nauk, 1–6 iyulya 1946 g. M.: Yurid. izd-vo MYu SSSR, 1948. S. 62–79.
5. Арсланов К.М. Понятие гражданско-правовой ответственности по германскому праву // Ученые записки Казанского университета. Гумани-тарные науки. 2013. Т. 155. Кн. 4. С. 101–108., Arslanov K.M. Ponyatie grazhdansko-pravovoy otvetstvennosti po germanskomu pravu // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Gumani-tarnye nauki. 2013. T. 155. Kn. 4. S. 101–108.