The Definition of Sovereign: Comparative Analysis of J. Austin's and C. Schmitt's Concepts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Definition of Sovereign: Comparative Analysis of J. Austin's and C. Schmitt's Concepts

Published:2021-12-25 Issue:4 Volume:9 Page:6-10
ISSN:2409-5087
Container-title:Advances in Law Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Kropanev Vadim¹

Affiliation:

1. National Research University Higher School of Economics - St. Petersburg

Abstract

The purpose of this research article is to compare the concepts of John Austin and Carl Schmitt on the definition of sovereign - finding the similarities and differences between them. The article analyzes the constitutional law of such states as the Russian Federation and the Vatican City State as a practical application of the results of comparing the concepts of determining the sovereign. In the analysis of the constitutional law of the Russian Federation, the results of the study of the concept of John Austin are used, and in the analysis of the constitutional law of the Vatican City State, the results of the study of the concept of Carl Schmitt are used. The subject of research, the definition of sovereign, is one of the most important topics of Theory of State and Law, therefore, everything stated in the article contributes to the development of understanding of statehood and legal systems and opens new opportunities for study and discussion in the scientific world.

Publisher

RIOR Publishing Center

Reference29 articles.

1. Bix B. «John Austin», The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition) / Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/austin-john/ (date of request: 03.01.2021), Bix B. «John Austin», The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition) / Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/austin-john/ (date of request: 03.01.2021)

2. Austin J. The province of jurisprudence determined: Second edition. London: Lincoln's Inn Fields, 1861. 511 p., Austin J. The province of jurisprudence determined: Second edition. London: Lincoln's Inn Fields, 1861. 511 p.

3. Дидикин А. Аналитическая философия права: истоки, генезис и структура. Томск: Издательский Дом Томского государственного университета, 2016. 244 с., Didikin A. Analiticheskaya filosofiya prava: istoki, genezis i struktura. Tomsk: Izdatel'skij Dom Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2016. 244 s.

4. Vinx L. «Carl Schmitt», The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition) / Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/schmitt/ (date of request: 20.02.2021), Vinx L. «Carl Schmitt», The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition) / Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/schmitt/ (date of request: 20.02.2021)

5. Шмитт К. Политическая теология. Сборник / Перевод с нем. заключит. статья и составление А. Филиппова. М.: Канон-Пресс-Ц, 2000. 168 с., SHmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. Sbornik / Perevod s nem. zaklyuchit. stat'ya i sostavlenie A. Filippova. M.: Kanon-Press-C, 2000. 168 s.