Abstract
Reviewing a body of work presents unique opportunities for making a theoretical contribution. Review articles can make readers think theoretically differently about a given problematic field. The purpose of this editorial is to propose to continue further study of the described problem. The topic of the theoretical article is whether employees are in projects, program and portfolio who do not want to work in such type of the organizations initially (before being involved in the project), or perhaps unwillingness to participate/work in some projects has appeared during execution of any project processes. Causes/reasons, or the vital necessity due to which the such kind of category of personnel is in the temporary organization, for example: availability, or lack of project management standards, financial needs, there is no other work for this period, etc. What is the percentage of employees in projects has the necessity to work in projects for any reasons. Does this percentage of employees negatively impact the success of projects and like the consequence on the programs and portfolios? It is important to note that the strict focus of this work is directed significantly to those category of employees who do not want to be / work in project sphere and the impact of the personnel group on processes, elements and results as an any projects as more larger organizations.
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,General Environmental Science
Reference21 articles.
1. GPM P5. (2019) The GPM P5TM Standard for Sustainability in Project Management GPM Global Version 2.0. Published in the United States of America different approach during designing and executing projects. https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF-Gen/The-GPM-P5-Standard-for-Sustainability-in- Project-Management-v2.0.pdf, GPM P5. (2019) The GPM P5TM Standard for Sustainability in Project Management GPM Global Version 2.0. Published in the United States of America different approach during designing and executing projects. https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF-Gen/The-GPM-P5-Standard-for-Sustainability-in- Project-Management-v2.0.pdf
2. IPMA. (2015). IPMA Reference Guide ICB4 in an Agile World Version 2.3. https://www.pma.at/files/downloads/577/ipma-icb4-in-agileworld-v23.pdf, IPMA. (2015). IPMA Reference Guide ICB4 in an Agile World Version 2.3. https://www.pma.at/files/downloads/577/ipma-icb4-in-agileworld-v23.pdf
3. Grau, N. Vice President Standards and Awards IPMA - International Project Management Association Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Friedberg, Germany. (2012) Standards and Excellence in Project Management - In Who Do We Trust? Published by Elsevier Ltd. Abstract (Grau). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.005, Grau, N. Vice President Standards and Awards IPMA - International Project Management Association Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Friedberg, Germany. (2012) Standards and Excellence in Project Management - In Who Do We Trust? Published by Elsevier Ltd. Abstract (Grau). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.005
4. Bodea, C. N. (2020), Improving the design of interpersonal skills modules for IT/MIS curricula: findings from a corpus linguistic research. https://doi.org/10.48009/4_iis_2020_178-186, Bodea, C. N. (2020), Improving the design of interpersonal skills modules for IT/MIS curricula: findings from a corpus linguistic research. https://doi.org/10.48009/4_iis_2020_178-186
5. Khedhaouria, A., Montani, F. @ Roy Thurik. (2017). Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing. International Journal of Project Management 35 (2017) 942–954 https://personal.eur.nl/thurik/Research/Articles/Time%20pressure%20and%20team%20member%20creativity%20within%20R&D%20projects.pdf, Khedhaouria, A., Montani, F. @ Roy Thurik. (2017). Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing. International Journal of Project Management 35 (2017) 942–954 https://personal.eur.nl/thurik/Research/Articles/Time%20pressure%20and%20team%20member%20creativity%20within%20R&D%20projects.pdf