Abstract
This study focuses on the relationship between the doctrines of the Incarnation and the Ascension of Jesus Christ, which often does not receive adequate attention in contemporary theology. The problem of separating the two doctrines is solved by re-examining the doctrine of the hypostatic union of Christ in the Lutheran and Calvinist traditions. Analytical and comparative approaches to the two traditions are undertaken to clearly show the tensions that arise and the possibility of imaginatively and faithfully linking the Incarnation and the Ascension. The study of these two models is furthered by comparing the two contemporary responses of the two traditions, one by Thomas Torrance and another by Niels Gregersen, that results in two ways of understanding Ascension, both as a reversal and as an extension.
Publisher
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Seminari Alkitab Asia Tenggara
Reference18 articles.
1. Adiprasetya, Joas. “The Liturgy of the In-Between.” Scottish Journal of Theology 72, no. 1 (February 2019): 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930618000704.
2. Carl E. Braaten, “The Person of Jesus Christ.” Dalam Christian Dogmatics: Volume 1, edisi revisi, diedit oleh Carl E. Braaten dan Robert W. Jenson, bab 6. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 2011.
3. Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Vol. 2. Diedit oleh John T. McNeill. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960.
4. Davies, John G. “The Peregrinatio Egeriae and the Ascension.” Vigiliae Christianae 8, no. 1 (1954): 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007254X00072.
5. Dawson, Gerrit S. Jesus Ascended: The Meaning of Christ’s Continuing Incarnation. London: Bloomsbury, 2004.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献