Affiliation:
1. Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia
Abstract
Key words: digital economy, Republic of Armenia, three-dimensional data set, extraction of latent components, agglomerative hierarchical clustering, k-means clustering
Digital transformation and interconnected processes cause many urgent issues, making it important to reorganize public policy implementation. National economies become more interconnected, which means that it is necessary to examine the possible connections between them and realise the main drivers of current realities. Such results are more valuable in the context of digitalisation.
In this research, cluster analysis for 25 countries is conducted using 6 digital economy indicators, based on their percentage change values for 10 years. The aims of the research are to find the way those economies are grouped, as well as the driving forces of such a division. The scientific novelty is the usage of the Candecomp/Parafac model, as a three-dimensional data set is used. After the extraction of latent components, agglomerative hierarchical and the k-means clustering algorithms are used, based on the country mode values.
In order to implement policies that promote the development of the digital economy in the Republic of Armenia, it is crucial to study how the countries included in the same cluster as Armenia make it homogeneous, what are the common problems and the best practices of solving them. Further research might shed light on the processes that influence the phenomena, considered as latent indicators of digital transformation.
Publisher
Vanadzor State University
Reference20 articles.
1. Bánhidi Z., Dobos I., Nemeslaki A., What the overall Digital Economy and Society Index reveals: A statistical analysis of the DESI EU28 dimensions // Regional Statistics. 2020, Volume 10, No. 2, pp. 42-62.
2. Bilozubenko V., Yatchuk O., Wolanin E., Serediuk T., Korneyev M., Comparison of the digital economy development parameters in the EU countries in the context of bridging the digital divide // Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2020, 18(2), pp. 206-218.
3. Bro R., PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications // Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 1997, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp. 149-171.
4. Ceulemans E., Kiers H.A.L., Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: A numerical convex hull based method // British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2006 (59), pp. 133–150.
5. Del Ferraro M.A., Kiers H.A.L., Giordani P., Package ‘ThreeWay’. October 12, 2022 (first published: September 7, 2015), 81 p., // URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ThreeWay/ThreeWay.pdf (accessed: 03.04.2023).