Fiscal dominants of military financing

Author:

PASICHNYI MykolaORCID

Abstract

Long-term military aggression has required updating approaches to budget revenue forma­tion to increase the fiscal effectiveness of taxes and ensure budget sustainability. The article is aimed to substantiate the main priorities for boosting the efficiency of the central budget revenue formation system in combating full-scale military aggression, which involves compliance with the principle of fiscal suffi­ciency in financing defense and security needs and fostering economic recovery. Syste­matic and logical approaches were used in the article. Various methods were applied, including gene­ralization, comparison, analysis and syn­the­sis, scientific abstraction and expert eva­luations. The USA’s experience in the field of budget revenues formation during wars shows that the authorities tried to design the taxpayer’s trust and ensure a fair cost for conducting a war for every citizen. The classic measures were increased tax rates on income and profits, and the active sale of government bonds. Great Britain has applied identical measures. The budget revenues formation policy has demon­strated significant changes since the full-scale invasion. The percentage of GDP redistribution through the central budget revenues in 2023 equaled 41.76%. The main features of tax revenues shaping (into a central budget) in 2022–2023 have been identified. Priority measures to raise the fiscal significance of tax revenues have been substantiated. This concerns the decrease of the shadow part of the gambling business; the excise goods markets; and labor incomes. In addition, the prerequisites for introducing a progressive personal income tax scheme have been determined.

Publisher

State University of Trade and Economics

Reference31 articles.

1. Bank, S., Stark, K., & Thorndike, J. (2008).WAR AND TAXES, Urban Institute Press, Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1127823

2. Blanchard, O. & J. Pisani-Ferry (2022). Fiscal support and monetary vigilance: economic policy implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for the European Union. Policy Contribution 06/2022. Bruegel. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/270497/1/1810083990.pdf

3. Debrun, X., & Jonung, L. (2019). Under threat: Rules-based fiscal policy and how to preserve it. European Journal of Political Economy, (57), 142-157. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/260258 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.09.001

4. Ellison, M., & Scott, A. (2017). Managing the UK national debt 1694-2017. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86148/1/CFMDP2017-27-Paper.pdf

5. Gilbert, C. (1970). American Financing of World War I. (Contributions in Economics and Economic History, 1). Praeger. 259 p.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3