Author:
Musa Titus Lamai,Kolawole Opeyemi Saheed
Abstract
Drought impacts various physiological processes in plants, ultimately affecting yield. The study aimed to determine the influence of drought stress on the fruit and yield quality of three different varieties of tomato namely; Rio, Dan Syria and UTC. The plants were subjected to four treatments which were subjected to 80-85% WHC (water holding capacity) (control, T1), 55-60% WHC (light drought stress, T2), 40-45% WHC (moderate drought stress, T3) and 30-35% WHC (severe drought stress, T4) and each replicated three times. The data generated were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). According to the findings, Rio outperformed the other varieties in terms of fresh fruit weight (21.59g), fruit pericarp thickness (3.96mm) and drought tolerance index (56.17%) under severe drought conditions. However, under severe drought conditions, the highest average number of fruits (2.33) was produced by the UTC, closely followed by Dan Syria (2). The results also showed that under severe drought stress, Rio outperformed the other varieties in terms of fresh and dry weight of shoot, as well as fresh and dry weight of root (18.82g, 3.47g and 3.34g, 1.29g) closely followed by Dan Syria measuring 12.47g, 1.66g, 3.10g, and 0.62g respectively. Under conditions of severe drought stress, Rio, UTC, and Dan Syria exhibit drought tolerance indices of 56.17%, 37.49%, and 20.44% respectively. These suggest that Rio is the most resilient to drought compared to the other varieties. Therefore, farmers should consider using Rio, which has a high level of drought resistance, as a means to mitigate the impact of drought.
Publisher
Federal University Dutsin-Ma
Reference25 articles.
1. Al-Maskri, A., Al-Busaidi, W., Al-Nadabi, H., Al-Fahdi, A., and Khan M.M. (2016). “Effects of drought stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar coolly,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Agricultural, Food, Biological and Health Sciences (AFBHS-16), August 22-24.
2. Choudhary, P., Rai, G. K., Bagati, S., Jamwal, D., Bhadwal, D., Shanti, V. R. and Rai, P. K. (2018). Evaluation of genetic variability in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. Mill) genotypes using microsatellite markers. International Journal of Current Microbiology Applied Science, 7(1): 2117-2124. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.255.
3. Christos, K., Chowdhurry, R., Heusden, S., Van de, C., Filfers, R., Visser, R.G. F., Bai, Y. and Van de Linder, G. (2015). Combined biotic and abiotic stress resistance in tomato. Euphytica, 202: 317 – 322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1363-x.
4. FAO. (2016). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome-Italy: Food and Agriculture organization of the United States. Available: faostat3.fao.org/search/tomato%20/E [Accessed on January, 2024].
5. Flexas, J., Bota, J., Galmes, J., Medrano, H. and Ribas-Carbó, M. (2006). Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: Responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiology Planta, 127: 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00621.x.