The Use of Dual Vacuum Stabilization Device to Reduce Kidney Motion for Stereotactic Radiotherapy Planning

Author:

Pham Daniel12,Kron Tomas3,Styles Colin4,Whitaker May5,Bressel Mathias6,Foroudi Farshad7,Schneider Michal2,Devereux Thomas1,Dang Kim1,Siva Shankar7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiotherapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

2. Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

3. Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

4. Barwon Health, Melbourne, Australia

5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

6. Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

7. Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Abdominal stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy is aided by motion management strategies to ensure accurate dose delivery as targets such as the kidney are easily influenced by breathing motion. Commercial devices such as compression plates and dual vacuum technology have been demonstrated to reduce the motion of lung and liver tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a dual vacuum system in reducing kidney motion as well to investigate any relationship between abdominal wall motions with kidney motion. Ten healthy volunteers were set up with and without vacuum compression (Elekta BodyFIXTM) to simulate free and dampened breathing. Ultrasound imaging was used to visualize kidney motion at the same time an abdominal surface marker was monitored using infrared imaging (Varian, Real Time Position Management). The resulting kidney and abdominal motion tracks were imported into motion analysis (PhysmoTM) and custom built software (Matlab) to calculate amplitude of motion independent of shifting baselines. Thirty-four kidney datasets were available for analysis, with six datasets unable to be retrieved. With vacuum compression six out of nine participants showed a mean reduction of kidney motion ranging between 1.6 and 8 mm ( p < 0.050). One participant showed an increase in motion of 8.2 mm ( p < 0.001) with vacuum compression. Two participants showed no significant change (<1 mm) in kidney motion. No relationship was observed for abdominal wall motion and motion changes in the left kidney ( r = 0.345, p = 0.402) or right kidney ( r = 0.527, p = 0.145). Vacuum compression reduced kidney motion in the majority of participants; however larger breathing motion can also result from its use. No pattern emerged regarding which patients may benefit from vacuum immobilization as abdominal wall motion was not found to be an adequate surrogate for kidney motion.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3