Abstract
The article provides a historical and philosophical reconstruction and a comprehensive and systematic coverage of the understanding of women in the fragments of thinkers of the pre-classical period of ancient philosophy. Preclassical ancient philosophy reflected mainly in four conceptual aspects: cosmological, embryological, misogynistic and apologetic. It is proved that in fact every of the early ancient Greek thinkers to a certain extent concerned the understanding of the phenomenon of women. It is highlighted that, based on the evidence of Akusilaus, Pythagoras and Empedocles, the phenomenon of the female arises as one of the formative factors along with the male, which implicitly speaks of the equality of both sexes in the cosmological aspect. It is substantiated that the ancient Greek preclassical embryology, although in many respects was mistaken in its views, however, these "false ideas" testified to the equality of both sexes for the emergence of a new person in the world. It was revealed that the misogynistic ideas of the early ancient thinkers were based on the fact that a woman has certain flaws, and therefore it is a big trouble if a person is under her power. Sometimes, such a vision led the philosophers of this period to have a negative attitude towards the institution of marriage. It was revealed that apologetic thinking about women were based on the fact that a woman has the right to education, training, and also that the main thing is to see in a woman not only an object of desire and a bearer of beauty, but a decent citizen who obeys power and established traditions. Preserved fragments of early Greek philosophers indicate the continuity of thought in ancient philosophy and their reception as thinkers of the classical (Plato, Aristotle) and Hellenistic (Plutarch, Simplicius, Philo) periods. The achievements of the pre-Socratics in the context of this issue also indicate that the women's issue arose from the very beginning of Western European philosophical discourse.
Publisher
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Reference36 articles.
1. 1. Lebedev A.V. Izbavlyayas' ot "dosokratikov" / Ellinist Andrej Lebedev - o tom, pochemu pora perepisat' istoriyu grecheskoj mysli. available at: https://www.academia.edu/43797604Izbavlyayas'_ot_dosokratikov_ellinist_Andrej_Lebedev_o_tom_pochemu_istoriyu_grecheskoj_mysli_pora_perepisat'
2. 2. Luriyе S.Y. Kommentarii i issledovaniya // S.Y. Luriyе. Demokrit. Leningrad: Nauka, 1970. P. 385-622.
3. 3. Alfieri V. E. Gli Atomisti. Frammenti e testimonianze. Traduzione e note. Bari: Laterza, 1936. 245 р.
4. 4. Antonius Melissa. Loci communes, Patrologiae graeca: 161 t. / Ed.J.-P. Migne. T. 136. Paris, 1865. P. 765-1244.
5. 5. Aristotle. Parts of Animals, Aristotle. Parts of Animals. Movement of Animals. Progression of Animals. Translated by A. L. Peck, E. S. Forster. Loeb Classical Library 323. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937. Р. 4-435.