PRINCIPLE OF THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN CIVIL PROCEDURE: ELI/UNIDROIT MODEL EUROPEAN RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR AND NATIONAL CONTEXT

Author:

Tsuvina T.ORCID,

Abstract

The article addresses the right to be heard as one of the new principles of civil procedure being analyzed through the prism of the provisions of the ELI/UNIDROIT Model European Rules of Civil Procedure and para. 1 of art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The paper highlights the problems of implementation of this principle at the national level. Within the framework of the ELI/UNIDROIT Model European Rules of Civil Procedure, the principle of the right to be heard includes: a) a fair opportunity to present claim and defense in court (Rule 11); b) the reasoned judgments, relied on the basis of the case file and the legal issues which the parties were able to comment on (Rule 12); c) the prohibition on the court communicating with a party in the absence of other party (Rule 13). Based on the analysis of the ELI / UNIDROIT Model European Rules of Civil Procedure and the case law of the ECtHR, the author advocates the view, according to which, the implementation of the principle of the right to be heard calls for the existence of a number of procedural guarantees of 'fair hearing' (para. 1 art. 6 of the ECHR). It is concluded that in modern conditions the principle of the right to be heard in its legal content is reduced to the requirement to provide a party to the proceedings the opportunity to bring to court their claims and objections, to effectively present their legal position before the court on equal terms with those given to the other party, as well as to obtain a reasoned court judgment. The implementation of this principle is associated with three groups of guarantees: a) guarantees that are prerequisites for the exercise of the right to be heard (proper notification of the person about the date, time and place of the court hearing); b) guarantees that constitute the core of the right to be heard and are implemented during the trial (oral hearing; opportunity to participate in the proceedings; the principle of 'equality of arms' and adversarial process); c) guarantees that are implemented after consideration of the case (a reasoned court judgment).

Publisher

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference57 articles.

1. 1. ELI/UNIDROIT Model European Rules of Civil Procedure. https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/civil-procedure/eli-unidroit-rules (in English).

2. 2. Izarova, I. O. (2021) Modelni yevropeiski pravyla tsyvilnoho protsesu ELI-UNIDROIT [ELI-Unidroit Model Rules of the European Civil Procedure]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky [Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal sciences], (2'117), 24-29. DOI: https:doi.org/10.17721/1728- 2195/2021/2.117-5. http://visnyk.law.knu.ua/images/ articles/117-3.pdf (in Ukrainian).

3. 3. Hrazhdanskyi protsess zarubezhnyh stran / pod red. A. H. Davtian (2009) [Civil Procedure of Foreign Countries / ed. by A. G. Davtian]. Moscow: Prospect. 480 p. (in Russian).

4. 4. Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. BVerfG, 18.01.2011. 1 BvR 2441/10. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/ Entscheidungen /DE/2011/01/rk20110118_1bvr244110.html (in German).

5. 5. Kuckes, N. (2006) Civil due process, criminal due process. Yale Law and Policy Review, 25, 1-61.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3