Affiliation:
1. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the place of behavioral approach in the structure of modern economic study. The evolution of views on the essence of economic behavior of individuals is desc ribed and the peculiarities of approaches to its definition of different economic schools are analyzed. The comparative analysis of behavioral and neoclassical approaches is presented; the peculiarity of the used method is the presentation of the neoclassical direction not in the aggregate, but as two main branches – cardinal and ordinal, which allowed for a more detailed analysis. The analysis revealed differences and some similarity of these directions of research. According to the findings, it is concluded that the behavioral approach is not the complete opposite of the neoclassical, but has a significant number of features close to the ideas of ordinary people, so it can be considered as a natural continuation of established ideas deepened through the use of an interdisciplinary approach. The article also outlines possible options for the development of neoclassical and behavioral approaches and the current issues for further research.
Publisher
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Reference15 articles.
1. Marshall A., 1890. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. London: MacMillan and Co.
2. Simon H., 1978. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. American Economic Review, 68(2), pp. 1-16.
3. Katona G., 1951. Psychological analysis of economic behavior. New York: McGrow-Hill.
4. Kahneman D., Tversky A., 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2). pp. 263-292.
5. Binmore K. 2009., Rational Decisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.